![]() In December, Lensa AI, an app that uses AI to generate a series of avatars using a selfie, came under fire for some of its terms and conditions. Since becoming mainstream, artworks from tools like Midjourney and DALL-E have become a source of controversy. 'Every commercial fashion photograph has a heavy dose of Photoshopping, including celebrity body replacement on the covers of magazines.'Īfter generating an image he likes through Midjourney, Mr Avery touches it up in Photoshop or adobe Lightroom before uploading it to social media ![]() Mr Avery said : 'Do people who wear makeup in photos disclose that? What about cosmetic surgery? He added that, while it seems 'right' to disclose when an image is AI-generated, the photography industry has not always been upfront about elements of deception in the past. 'The creative process is still very much in the hands of the artist or photographer, not the computer.' 'It takes an enormous amount of effort to take AI-generated elements and create something that looks like it was taken by a human photographer,' he said. Once given a prompt to generate an image from, they will note a series of key features that could be present and generate pixels to visualise their interpretation.Īfter generating an image he likes through Midjourney, Mr Avery touches it up in Photoshop or adobe Lightroom before uploading it to social media. These algorithms are fed millions of photos to 'learn' what different objects are supposed to look like, and eventually put them together. This is similar to DALL-E, a text-to-image tool released last year by OpenAI, which also created the revolutionary AI chatbot ChatGPT. Midjourney requires the user to input a text prompt that it uses to generate four different images. However, he argues that, while he did not take his 160 images with a camera, they still took a lot of effort to create. 'But now it has become an artistic outlet. ![]() The artist explained: 'My original aim was to fool people to showcase AI and then write an article about it. He even went as far as fabricating the type of camera and lens he used to take them. Up until recently, Mr Avery had either been purposefully vague to his followers about how he acquired his images, or outright told them they were real photographs. 'The Instagram response has taken me off guard. The end art product resonates with people.' 'Probably 95 per cent plus of the followers don't realise. I'd like to come clean', he told Ars Technica. How did you light it', to which the artist responded to disclose it was AI-generated. Some mention that the long tales and some 30 hashtags included in the image captions mean that they miss the '#aiart' disclaimer hidden within it.īut these negative comments are surrounded by hundreds of others praising Mr Avery for his photography skills. What a bunch of s#$&' and 'Fictional story, fictional photo'. Others read 'Bruce does not exist, nor has he wandered any streets. 'I can understand the appeal of the "hattrick" but you need to make it known via a hashtag at the very least that these are AI generated and edited.' Under a striking image of an older man entitled 'Bighearted Bruce', one commenter wrote: 'Skimming through your posts though you do seem to be disingenuously misleading people from the start. The apparent 'photos' were created by Midjourney - a software that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to generate images - and touched up on Photoshop
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |